why?

online poker

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

EUR/JPY Corrective Movement, Janaury 26, 2011 (Weekly Strategy) 2011-01-26

 EUR/JPY

The strong resistance level at 113.00 forms the last line of defense that the pair may yet reach in a light momentum movement. Only a breach of the 113.00 resistance level will cancel the bearish prediction on the pair.
That said, a basis for a sell position depends a breach of the two central price levels – 112.00 and 111.80. The first, 112.00 support level, represents the pattern's trend line and will form a sell trigger if it is breached downwards. The downwards movement is expected to carry the pair down to the lower support level of 109.40.



Boeing Forecast Trails Estimates on Pension, Delays


By Susanna Ray
(Updates with executives’ comments from ninth paragraph.)
Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Boeing Co. tumbled the most in five months after forecasting 2011 profit that trailed analysts’ estimates amid delays to its two marquee jets, higher pension expenses and scaled-back defense spending in the U.S.
 Net income will be $3.80 to $4 a share, including an increase of 58 cents a share in pension expenses, the Chicago- based company said in a statement. That lagged behind the $4.53- a-share average estimate of 26 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.
Boeing has struggled with its two newest planes, the 787 Dreamliner, which is three years late, and the 747-8, running a year and a half behind schedule, while the defense business has been hurt by military budget cuts. Boeing is responding by boosting output of other commercial jets to record rates as air- travel demand has recovered from the recession.
Boeing’s outlook is “mediocre at best,” said Joel Levington, who oversees corporate credit at Brookfield Investment Management in New York. “From the bondholder’s perspective, we think the combination of still meaningful operational execution risks and tight spreads on the bonds make other industrial issuers much more attractive at this time.”
Boeing fell $2.06, or 2.9 percent, to $70.18 at 2:21 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, and the shares earlier made their biggest intraday drop since Aug. 24. The decrease was the biggest today among the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
Corporate Bonds
The planemaker’s 3.5 percent notes due in February 2015 fell 0.4 percent to 104.9 cents on the dollar today, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Boeing’s fourth-quarter profit declined 8.2 percent to $1.16 billion, or $1.56 a share, from $1.27 billion, or $1.75. Earnings were buoyed by a 50-cents-a-share tax settlement that helped Boeing beat analysts’ projection of $1.11. Sales fell 7.7 percent to $16.6 billion.
In 2010, net income more than doubled to $3.31 billion, or $4.45 a share. Sales climbed 5.8 percent to $64.3 billion.
Revenue this year may be $68 billion to $71 billion, in line with estimates of about $69.5 billion. Excluding the pension and tax adjustments, profit will rise about 6 percent, with the first quarter the weakest, making up about 15 percent of the year’s earnings, Chief Financial Officer James Bell said on a conference call.
Operating Performance
The higher pension costs include a lower discount rate and smooth in the poorer performance from the past few years, he said.
“Boeing delivered strong operating performance and exceptional cash generation from core production and services businesses in 2010, which helped mitigate the impact of development program challenges,” Chief Executive Officer Jim McNerney said in today’s statement.
The company said it plans to deliver 485 to 500 airliners this year, up from 462 in 2010. Toulouse, France-based Airbus SAS shipped a record 510 jets last year, holding on to the top commercial spot it has claimed since 2003. Airbus also won more orders, with 574 net purchases compared with Boeing’s 530.
Boeing’s 2011 delivery figures include a combined 25 to 40 jets from the 787 and 747-8 development programs, which had both been scheduled to enter service last year.
The company in September added another six months to the 747-8’s delivery date, saying the plane now won’t be shipped until mid-2011. Earlier this month, the 787 was postponed a seventh time, until the third quarter of this year, because of an electrical fire in November that grounded the test fleet and forced part of the power system to be redesigned.
737, 777 Models
Production of the 787 will still ramp up to 10 a month in 2013, from two now, though the cushion that had been in the internal plan is “now largely eroded,” McNerney said.
Demand for the 737, the world’s most widely flown plane, and the 777 twin-aisle jet, Boeing’s most profitable airliner, has helped cushion the effect of higher costs from the delays.
By 2013, Boeing will be building 66 percent more 777s and 20 percent more narrow-body 737s in factories around its commercial headquarters in Seattle. McNerney said on today’s conference call that there’s “more bias to move up” on production.
Orders more than tripled last year, lifting the commercial backlog to 3,443 airplanes valued at $256 billion. Discussions with customers are at about the same level this year as in 2010, McNerney said, declining to predict orders.
‘Market Will Wait’
Boeing probably won’t offer a new engine for its 737, McNerney said, even as Airbus racks up orders this year for its A320 NEO, which will offer new power plants as of 2016. A new engine along with the new narrow-body plane Boeing is working on would put the backlog at risk twice, so would make sense only if the new jet wouldn’t be ready until 2025 or later, he said.
“If we could come up with the right airplane in roughly 2019, 2020, somewhere in there, I personally feel there’s a strong argument the market will wait for us, notwithstanding re- engining,” he said.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes posted a decline of about 7 percent in sales last year after reducing production of the 777 because of the recession and not delivering any 747s while it works on the newest version of the jumbo jet.
This year, the operating margin will drop to as much as 8.5 percent of sales, from 9.4 percent in 2010, because the initial 787 and 747-8 deliveries are going to be recorded at zero margin, Bell said.
Revenue fell about 5 percent last year for the defense half of Boeing’s business, based in St. Louis, and the operating margin declined to 9 percent from 9.8 percent. That figure could fall further this year to as low as 8.5 percent, Boeing said.



businessweek

...no change to easy money

US Federal Reserve signals no change to easy money

The US Federal Reserve has signalled no change in its loose monetary policy.


The central bank concluded its latest two-day policy meeting saying interest rates would remain near zero and its plan to buy $600bn of US government debt would proceed as scheduled.
The bank's rate-setting committee said the recovery was still too slow to bring down unemployment quickly.
It noted the recent rise in commodity prices, but said underlying inflation was still falling towards zero.
The Fed reiterated a previous warning that economic conditions were "likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period".
None of the policy committee's members disagreed with its decisions or its statement.
Borrowing costs Markets had largely anticipated the non-event, although there had been some speculation the Fed would curtail its programme of "quantitative easing" - injecting cash into the financial system by buying up government debt.
US government bond prices have been falling steadily in recent months in response to the economic recovery and higher inflation expectations, leading to a general rise in borrowing costs in the US.
Following the announcement, they rallied briefly - as investors realised that the Fed was going to continue with its debt buying programme in full - before falling back again.
"This isn't a surprise to anyone in the industry," said Frank Hsu of New York brokerage Fimat.
"But if they are still going forwards with [quantitative easing]... [banks] will have to change their lending standards, if [quantitative easing] forces them to lend out money rather than holding it."



bbc.co

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Fundamental Analysis, January 18, 2011


The main indexes of the Asian stock exchanges are traded with a neutral trend this morning. Rates rose this morning in Hong Kong while the Hang Seng Index gained 0.8%, in leading the real estate sector which is expected to register a nice rise in 2011. The Shanghai stock exchange is clouding the Asia trend, while the Chinese index is weakened by 0.3%. Tokyo registered a slight increase of 0.3% today while the Kospi Index in South Korea is now registering an 0.2% increase. The Australian index added 0.3%.
Europe's stock exchanges closed yesterday with slight rate drops, due to the deliberations of the European Union's ministers of finance regarding the strategy to fight the continent's debt crisis. At the end of the trade day the London stock exchange dropped by 0.3%, Paris retreated by 0.2% and Frankfurt closed the German stock exchange without change.
The European ministers of finance began just an hour ago deliberations regarding the strategy to battle the debt crisis in the area, following Germany's backing down somewhat from its objection to increasing the emergency fund and following Portugal's insistence that it can handle the crisis without receiving an aid package.

AUD/USD. Weekly and Monthly Pivot Points, For January 18 to January 21, 2011

 

__WEEKLY_______
Weekly - R3 = 1.0219
Weekly - R2 = 1.0119
Weekly - R1 = 1.0003
Weekly Pivot = 0.9903
Weekly - S1 = 0.9787
Weekly - S2 = 0.9687
Weekly - S3 = 0.9571





InstaForex Companies Group © 2007-2010

Mr Jobs

Apple makes record profits of $6bn in last three months

Apple made record profits and record revenues in the run-up to Christmas as shoppers bought more Macs, iPhones, and iPads than analysts predicted.

The company said that in the three months to 25 December, net profit was $6bn (£3.7bn) on revenues of $26.74bn.
Steve Jobs, Apple's chief executive, said in a statement: "We had a phenomenal holiday quarter."
There was no further mention of his health problems following Monday's news that Mr Jobs is taking medical leave.
While he is continuing as chief executive and will be involved in any major decisions, day-to-day running has passed to chief operating officer Tim Cook.
Apple's first-quarter profit is a 71% jump on the same period last year.
Daniel Ernst, analyst at Hudson Square Research, said: "Apple blew away earnings expectations, again. It seems to be a recurring event for these guys.
"It was across the board, top to bottom, another great quarter," he said.
The company sold 4.13 million Macs during the quarter, a 23% rise year-on-year, and 16.24 million iPhones, a leap of 86%.
iPod sales fell 7% to 19.45 million units. Apple sold 7.33 million iPads.
Shares in the company, which had fallen during the day, rose 4% in after-hours trading to about $354.
News of Mr Jobs' latest health problems came on a US public holiday, when financial markets were closed.
When markets re-opened on Tuesday, the shares immediately fell as much as 6%, but eventually closed down 2.2% in official trading.
The California-based company said that 62% of its revenues came from outside the US. In the Asia-Pacific market, which includes China, Apple said revenues almost tripled.
Mr Jobs is credited with turning around the fortunes of the company

 Medical history
Some analysts are concerned about what Mr Jobs' absence from Apple might mean for the company's future, as he has become inextricably linked with its success.
In his statement on Tuesday, Mr Jobs was very upbeat about the Apple's future. He said: "We are firing on all cylinders and we've got some exciting things in the pipeline for this year".
Despite Mr Jobs' previous ill health, the company's stock market value has approximately quadrupled in the past two years.
In late 2008 to mid-2009, Mr Jobs was absent from Apple for six months to have a liver transplant.
It was part of a series of treatments he has undergone for pancreatic cancer. He was first diagnosed in 2004 and underwent surgery later that year to remove a tumour from his pancreas.
"US investors are concerned about his absence," says Yair Reiner, stock analyst at New York investment firm Oppenheimer & Co.
"But the ups and downs of his health over the last couple of years have allowed investors to partly discount his departure into the price of their shares."
In an e-mail to staff, Mr Jobs said he would be back at work as soon as he could.
The letter "leaves everything to the imagination" said Mr Reiner, adding that the company had provided no guidance as to whether it would be a short break or the prelude to a permanent departure.
Mr Cook has run the company in the past during Mr Jobs' absence.
According to Mr Reiner, markets have a lot of confidence in the management abilities of Mr Jobs' stand-in, although he has not yet had the opportunity to demonstrate whether he can provide the same visionary leadership as his boss.
Mr Jobs' health issues come as Apple is rumoured to be preparing to launch the second version of its iPad - the successor to the tablet computer it launched in 2010.
With the product line-up for the next two to three years already set, Mr Reiner said that the real impact of a permanent departure of the Apple head would only be felt some years down the line.



bbc.co

Tax Reform Is in the Eye of the Beholder

Obama wants any overhaul to trim the deficit or be revenue neutral


By Albert R. Hunt, Ryan J. Donmoyer and Rich Miller

In an increasingly polarized Congress, most lawmakers agree that the U.S. Tax Code is unfair, complicated, and inefficient. Yet as President Barack Obama and his economic team consider making tax reform a centerpiece of the State of the Union address this month, they keep bumping up against a simple question: Is it worth it?
The White House is mulling a plan to revamp the code, starting with corporate taxes, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Jan. 12. "We're examining whether we can find the political support for a comprehensive tax reform," Geithner said. The Obama team's one condition is that any overhaul must either raise revenue to cut the $1.3 trillion budget deficit or be "revenue neutral," meaning some corporate taxes may rise or fall as long as the levy produces the same amount it does now.
Congressional Republicans say they are eager to work with Obama, and most agree with Democrats that lowering tax rates would involve painful choices to offset lost revenue, including curbs on cherished tax breaks such as the deduction for interest on home mortgages or subsidies for corporations' overseas investments. Within the White House, a vigorous debate is under way over whether picking those fights would be worth the political pain if the deficit isn't also slashed, says a top Administration official who insisted on anonymity to discuss an internal debate.
Republicans say reforms must lower taxes for all—and include both individuals and companies. "Our problem is not a lack of revenue, so I don't want to see tax reform that ends up raising people's taxes," says Senator Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), the minority whip. Alice M. Rivlin, who served on the deficit reduction commission that in December urged a wholesale rewrite of the code, disagrees. "We need to find a way of raising more revenue, but with a more efficient and more growth-friendly tax system," says Rivlin, who was President Bill Clinton's budget director.
On Dec. 16, Obama met with 20 executives, including the chief executive officers of Google (GOOG) and Cisco Systems (CSCO), to discuss ways to fuel the economy, including tax reform. Dorothy Coleman, vice-president for tax and domestic economic policy at the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), says her group has recently spoken with Administration officials about a broad overhaul. Geithner was scheduled to meet with chief financial officers on Jan. 14 to continue the discussion, a Treasury spokeswoman said.

One question is whether corporate and individual tax rewrites can be accomplished in tandem. Representative Dave Camp (R-Mich.), the new chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, says he wants to tackle both together. The Administration says only the corporate code is up for discussion now. Coleman says that approach would not satisfy NAM, many of whose companies are structured as S corporations, in which owners pay taxes on company profits at the individual rate rather than the corporate rate.
Administration officials agree sweeping reform is a long shot. The most apt comparison may be the 1985-86 overhaul that dramatically lowered individual rates while subjecting more income to taxation by curbing special breaks. In 1985 there was a Republican President and Senate and a Democratic-controlled House. A coalition of Democratic tax reformers and supply-side conservatives who wanted lower rates joined together to take on the special interests. Still, it took a politically painful year and a half before a measure was enacted. There is little sign of such an alliance today.

 
 
businessweek

Thursday, January 13, 2011

US banks 'foreclosed on record

Foreclosure filings were up 1.67% from 2009, figures show
Banks repossessed a record one million US homes in 2010, and could surpass that number this year, figures show.








Foreclosure tracker RealtyTrac said about five million homeowners were at least two months behind on their mortgage payments.
Foreclosures are likely to remain numerous while unemployment remains stubbornly high, the group said.
Among the worst hit states were Nevada, Arizona, Florida and California, once at the heart of the housing boom.
Peak ahead Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate for the fourth year in a row, with one in 11 housing units receiving a foreclosure notice, and RealtyTrac said more than half the nation's foreclosures occurred in Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois and Michigan.
RealtyTrac said 2.9 million US households were subject to a foreclosure filing last year, up 1.67% from 2009.
"2011 is going to be the peak," senior vice-president Rick Sharga told the Associated Press news agency.
Foreclosures slowed toward the end of 2010 amid revelations that banks had based the proceedings on improper documentation, but the pace is likely to rebound in the first quarter of 2011, Mr Sharga said.



bbc.co

Factories are having to cope with higher energy bills

US wholesale prices saw their biggest increase in 11 months in December, led by higher energy and food costs, official figures have shown.





The Producer Price Index rose 1.1% in December, compared with November's 0.8% gain. It was the largest increase since January of last year.
Heating oil saw the biggest price rise, up 12.3%, while the cost of petrol gained 6.4%. Food prices rose 0.8%.
Excluding energy and food costs, prices rose just 0.2% last month.
This was a slowdown on the 0.3% increase in November, said the Labor Department.
The figures come a day after the Federal Reserve said the US economy was continuing to grow moderately, but suffering from high unemployment.
Vegetable price rises The big rise in US energy and food costs is being replicated around the world, as oil prices have increased following growing demand, and the cost of food has risen as bad weather has hit certain crops.
Among food products in the US, vegetables posted the biggest increase in wholesale prices in December, jumping 22.8%. They were followed by fresh fruits, which added 15%.
Also on Wednesday, the US Agriculture Department warned that US grain prices had risen to their highest level in two and a half years. These price rises came as a result of a drop in corn and soya bean production.
Despite the big rise in US wholesale prices, it has yet to spread across to consumer inflation. Analysts say this is because companies are still operating below full capacity, and competitive pressures were meaning they are so far absorbing their own price rises.
The most recent data for US consumer inflation showed that the Consumer Price Index measure rose just 0.1% in November, down from 0.2% in December.
The Federal Reserve, the US central bank, has also warned that deflation - falling prices - is a concern, as it encourages consumers to put off purchases in the hope that the cost will fall in the future.


bbc.co

Sunday, January 9, 2011

'Afghan' - Land of War and Opportunity

Where most people see only deprivation and misery, Paul Brinkley sees potential. With luck, business will agree 

 By Jason Kelly

The skyline of the city of Herat, in the westernmost corner of Afghanistan, is dominated by the Qala Ikhtyaruddin, a 700-year-old stone citadel. On a chilly December afternoon, as the sun begins to dip, the citadel's grounds are largely unoccupied. The general public isn't allowed in until renovations to the time-ravaged site are finished. Paid for in part by a $725,000 grant from the U.S. government, the project is scheduled to be completed at the end of 2011.
Paul A. Brinkley isn't the general public. As U.S. Deputy Under Secretary for Defense, he moves freely behind the barricades, ushering a handful of American visitors, including Silicon Valley executives Atul Vashistha and Mike Faith, the heads of Neo Group and Headsets.com, through dark corridors and up steep stairways to the highest reaches of the fortress. The tour comes after a morning of meetings with the provincial governor and the local university's chancellor and students, all of them pushing, along with Brinkley, for the executives to consider a noble and dangerous proposition: opening up shop in Afghanistan. "I've never regretted taking a businessperson to the theater," Brinkley says. "This is about getting their eyes on the problem."
In Herat, Kabul, and cities large and small, Brinkley serves as tour guide, ambassador, fixer, motivational speaker, and leader of the unofficial Afghanistan chamber of commerce. With all of his titles and duties, he prefers to think of himself primarily as a matchmaker, negotiating high-stakes unions between multinational companies like IBM (IBM) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Afghan officials and entrepreneurs. Building a culture of business is the only way Brinkley and General David Petraeus, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, believe they can counteract the legendary forces of destruction here—from decades of war and deprivation to the brutal rule of the Taliban and a reliance on opium as a chief export. "It's an infusion of optimism in what can seem like a hopeless situation," Brinkley says. "The Afghans say, 'People actually want to do business with us? Maybe there is something at the end of the rainbow.'"
The Task Force for Business & Stability Operations was launched in 2006 as part of the Defense Dept.'s effort to link military strategy and economic development in Iraq. For four years the task force recruited Western companies in an attempt to modernize Iraq's banking system and reopen factories. Early results were unsuccessful. Security concerns prevented staff from restarting most heavy manufacturing sites, and overseas companies balked at doing business in Iraq because of the very real possibility that their employees could be wounded or killed. A former chief information officer at JDS Uniphase (JDSU) in California, Brinkley joined the Defense Dept. to help with internal business operations. His work in Iraq spurred the creation of the task force. "When we started our work in May 2006," he says, "[Iraq] was in a complete daily deterioration."
The task force ultimately sponsored more than 200 visits by corporate executives and investors, including Honeywell International (HON) Chief Executive Officer David M. Cote and Boeing (BA) CEO James W. McNerney Jr., which generated investment commitments of more than $5 billion, according to task force data.
That doesn't include oil-related investments; Iraq, home to the world's fifth-biggest oil reserves, has, finally, seen some success in reconstructing its energy industry. On Jan. 3 the country agreed to build pipelines across its shared border with Jordan. "The idea of what the military is trying to do is a constructive one," says Isobel Coleman, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. "If you're there for the long haul, creating jobs and sustainable businesses is crucial."
With the Iraq project coming to an end, Brinkley shifted his focus in 2010 to Afghanistan, an even more daunting task. More than 30 years of economic and political distress dating to the Soviet invasion of 1979, and spanning the Taliban era and nearly a decade of war, have turned the country into a synonym for hopelessness. Corruption is rampant—accusations reach all the way up to President Hamid Karzai's family—and unlike Iraq, Afghanistan didn't have much of an economic base to begin with: Afghanistan's gross domestic product in 2009 was $26.9 billion, ranking it 110th in the world. Iraq is 65th, with a GDP of $109.9 billion, according to the CIA World Factbook.
In Iraq, thanks in part to Brinkley's efforts, General Electric (GE) is building power plants to meet the country's power shortages; Honeywell opened an office last year to sell equipment to the oil and gas industry; and Daimler (DAI), having created a motor vehicle training workshop in 2008, established a Baghdad office a year later. "Success depends on those iconic companies," Brinkley says. "You augment them with mid-tier companies who are more risk-oriented. Your agility and speed comes from there." Brinkley needs to replicate and expand on the process in Afghanistan, using the military's own spending power to promote local companies and convincing multinationals that Afghanistan is not just a safe place but also a land of real opportunity.
Brinkley and his team allowed a Bloomberg Businessweek reporter to shadow them for five days in December as they went about their Red Bull-fueled, stubbornly optimistic work. Arriving in Kabul on a commercial flight, the task force team and one of two business delegations in the country at the time spent a day in the capital before flying to Herat, then back to Kabul for three more days of tours and meetings. From the natural resources buried in the mountains and valleys where blood is still shed almost daily, to the women-run workshops tucked in corners of Kabul, to the restless students unwilling to become another lost generation, Brinkley sees huge potential. Whether he can convince anyone it's worth the risk is another matter.
With his shaved head, tieless suit, and black leather jacket, Brinkley cuts a distinctly non-Afghan figure. He peppers his conversations with simple phrases such as "Tashakor" (thank you) and frequently puts his right hand over his heart, an Afghan gesture of respect. In meetings, he listens more than he speaks, usually making introductions and then retreating with a self-effacing remark. During an encounter with Herat University's chancellor, he introduces Vashistha and Faith, plugs their Silicon Valley credentials, and then says, "That's my entire contribution, so I'm going to step back."
Brinkley, 44, grew up outside Dallas and earned undergraduate and master's degrees in engineering from Texas A&M University. He is now known, to members of the task force, as "Mr. Brinkley" or "the boss."
Brinkley's pitch to executives starts at home. In the months before the December trip he was in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Dallas, Houston, and New York—and working the phones in between from his Pentagon office—to make his case. Like any good salesman, he believes that if he can just get the customer onto the showroom floor, he can close a deal. "We tap into something," says Brinkley. "There is a huge desire to support the mission among all Americans. People want to help and are at least willing to take a look at it. We just tell them, 'Come over and see for yourself.' "
Brinkley atop the 700-year-old Qala Ikhtyaruddin Benjamin Lowy

Once the executives are in the country, Brinkley the matchmaker emerges. Between meetings one day in Kabul, Brinkley mentions the similarities between his job and eHarmony, a website that uses technology to figure out which singles will make the best married couples—only instead of producing children, these partnerships are meant to nurture Afghan industries and generate profits for both parents. Like any good coupling, what comes of it isn't ultimately up to the person who made the introduction. "If there's money to be made on a risk- adjusted basis that makes American CEOs comfortable, they're going to do it," says the Council on Foreign Relations' Coleman. "Having a nice dog and pony show may speed that process, but it's not going to change the calculus."
In Afghanistan, Brinkley has assembled a 75-person team with a $150 million annual budget. The group is culled from his own business network, other parts of the government, political campaigns, and nongovernmental organizations. The apparent camaraderie between its members stems from the nomadic circumstances of the job. Stretches of typical Pentagon life back in Washington alternate with long visits to a country where the mood can swing from uneasy to scary, depending on the day and location. "We live where we work," Brinkley says. "You get to know aspects of people you normally wouldn't see."
The task force's work in Afghanistan consists largely of an endless stream of meetings, many of which are conducted over platters of nuts and raisins and cups of green tea. Sleep is elusive. That owes in part to the brutality of time zones: Just as a Kabul workday ends, Washington and New York, nine and a half hours behind, are getting started. A second workday essentially begins after dinner, with BlackBerrys buzzing throughout the evening. There's no delineation between weekday and weekend, especially given that the Afghan weekend falls on Friday and Saturday. Clothing retailer kate spade new york's chief merchandising officer, Sydney Price, arrived on a Saturday, had what amounted to a working dinner with the task force, and then started Sunday morning with meetings and tours. Brinkley and his staff use their proximity to the guests for the soft sell, talking about what they saw that day, sharing stories aimed at emphasizing the country's humanity.
Security concerns mandate meticulous planning. Over the course of a two-week period, Wall Street bankers, Silicon Valley executives, and Los Angeles-based investors were ferried around Kabul and other parts of the country in armored vehicles for meetings with local business owners, artisans, government officials, and students. To deal with the unpredictability of airline schedules and traffic, team members and visitors often leave their quarters before dawn. Most meals are taken inside the compound; occasionally they are at a hotel restaurant. "I expected it to be a lot more chaotic," says Vashistha. "What I saw was much more of a high-security zone than a war zone."
The Brinkley team typically isn't embedded with the military, which allows them more freedom to work with a range of officials and executives. The group is closely connected to the military mission, though, and Brinkley is exuberant in his loyalty to Petraeus. "He has a phenomenal intellectual range and capacity," Brinkley says of the general. "We're in tight partnership."
Over the course of three December days, Petraeus meets with two separate delegations, including Vashistha's, and has a separate briefing with Brinkley. The general is appreciative of the visitors' curiosity about Afghanistan—and quick to press them to move beyond interest and into commitment. "Just like you can't commute to a fight, you can't commute to business," Petraeus says. When one member of a delegation says the task force has provided a keyhole into what's happening here, Petraeus responds: "We need you to do more than look through the keyhole. We need you to go through the door."
Kabul's infrastructure was designed for about half a million people. The city currently has a population of more than 3 million. Traffic barely moves, and the crumbling roads and bridges are constant reminders that it will take decades before Kabul joins the ranks of modern cities.
Yet flashes of 21st century life are evident. Mobile phones, sold by five different carriers, are everywhere. Afghanistan, with a population of 29 million, boasts 15 million wireless subscribers. This gives hope to outside investors that there's a technological backbone to exploit. "My cell service is better here than in the Bay Area," says Faith of Headsets.com, part of the Silicon Valley delegation. He's a colleague of Vashistha's through their local chapter of the Young President's Organization. Faith says Afghanistan's not yet a big enough market for his company, but he's surprised by the progress he sees. "I'm excited about the possibilities."
Brinkley and his visitors troop up several flights of stairs to visit with Amir Zai Sangin, the government's Minister of Communications and Information Technology, who has the enviable job of proselytizing for what is arguably the most advanced sector of the Afghan economy. An Afghan flag sits in a corner of his wood-paneled office, a large portrait of Karzai hangs behind his desk. Over juice, tea, and cookies, Sangin recounts how Afghanistan created a communications infrastructure from nothing in 2002. "People had to travel to another country to make a phone call," he says. "Now, in Kabul, even the poorest have mobile phones. The beggars have mobile phones."
There are five major telecommunications companies and dozens of domestic Internet service providers. About 80 percent of the population is covered by the telecom infrastructure—a bigger portion than in India, he says. "Our strategy for the last five years was infrastructure. The next five is applications."
While Afghans have been busy talking on their phones, their banking system lay fallow. Historically, Afghans have tended not to trust banks and have avoided using them. When money needed to be moved, transfer agents called hawalas were called in. The notion of a bank as an institution that secures savings and lends out money is still quite alien.
Nadia Dawood, an Iraqi-American, left her job on Wall Street six years ago and started working with the U.S. Agency for International Development. Eventually she landed alongside Brinkley and was charged with trying to build a modern banking system in Iraq. Saddam Hussein's government had set up a network that drove all funds through state-owned and -controlled financial institutions. The task force automated the banking sector and helped install modern services at more than 200 bank branches throughout the country. Like the rest of the task force's members, Dawood has turned her attention to Afghanistan, where among the first orders of business was persuading the government to pay its soldiers and police officers through electronic funds transfers. By the end of last year all of the military and 80 percent of the police were paid on that basis. The next step was persuading them to actually leave their money in a bank.
What the banks were—and where they were—was a question not easily answered when Dawood arrived in February 2010. Now she has a spreadsheet detailing banks' deposits and the number of branches. Getting that data was crucial for the next stage—bringing in a global financial-services company that would connect Afghanistan's monetary system to the rest of the world.
The first bank the team approached was Citigroup (C), which had played a similar role in Iraq. The financial conglomerate was a natural choice, given that it processes the U.S. government's payments abroad and has shown an appetite for working in emerging markets. Still, the work was neither fast nor easy. Citigroup conducted six months of due diligence in Afghanistan, including a weeklong road show with executives at the country's handful of domestic banks. The company made a deal with Afghanistan International Bank, and now the two are helping process payments made by NATO forces to local contractors. "By paying invoices in local currency, it ensures the money stays in the country to stimulate the economy," says Kevin Fitzgerald, the head of Citigroup's public-sector unit in North America, who oversees the company's contracts with the U.S. government. "The entire amount is deposited directly in a bank without being diverted or delayed by a local government agency."
Progress in Afghanistan is never linear. While the implementation of a modern banking system has shown promise, Kabul Bank, one of the country's largest institutions, was beset by a corruption scandal in 2010. Last summer six private security guards were also poisoned and stabbed at a Kabul bank branch in Mazar-e Sharif. Nothing is easy.
Noorullah Delawari, who returned to his native Afghanistan in 2002 after a career spent mostly in Southern California, where he worked at Lloyds Bank's operations there, is one of those pushing to improve the financial system. After a stretch running Afghanistan's central bank, he's now an adviser to Karzai and serves as president of the Afghanistan Investment Support Agency, whose motto is "the Silk Road to Opportunities." AISA is one of the task force's many partners, organizing road shows and pitching businesses in China, Washington, and India. During a meeting in his office with one of the task force's delegations, Delawari rattles off statistics: Through August 2010, 3,267 companies were established in the country, with 38,000 new jobs tied to the investment. "Any positive development will help end this vicious war."
As Delawari speaks, Brinkley sweeps in, straight from the airport. The men embrace. "One of the pleasant surprises coming to Afghanistan was AISA," Brinkley tells the group. "It's like a massive accelerant." At the end of the meeting, Delawari insists that Brinkley accept a small carpet sample, produced at a new factory that AISA and the task force worked to get started, as a gift.
Corruption is often cited, alongside security concerns and lack of infrastructure, as one of the biggest obstacles for companies considering expansion to Afghanistan. Brinkley says the task force seeks to soothe fears about corruption by embedding accountants and legal advisers within government ministries. Ultimately, avoiding corruption is up to the companies. "It's a huge problem," says Erik Malmstrom, co-author of a November study sponsored by the Kauffman Foundation on private-sector development in Afghanistan. The report, titled "Afghanistan's Willing Entrepreneurs" and written with Jake Cusack, found something that surprises many visitors: Afghans worry less about physical threats than about the integrity of the business environment. "Every step of the way," Malmstrom says, "businesses are having to deal with corruption."
Herat is the site of some of Brinkley's most successful matchmaking, and it's easy to see why. Located about 50 miles from the relative calm of Iran—which, despite its political saber-rattling, is home to the world's 19th-biggest economy—Herat doesn't feel like a city in a war zone. Its governor, Sayed Hussain Anwari, stresses the quietude during an enthusiastic sales pitch over a breakfast of traditional breads and pan-fried eggs served with chilies at his mansion near the center of town. "People here want to keep their comfortable life. In the south, they have nothing to lose, so they fight," the governor, dressed in a business suit, explains. "Here, they have something to lose, so they don't fight." He tells the Americans that he's looking to Bangalore as a model for Herat, an analog that will be repeated throughout the day. Jobs are the top priority for both the task force and the locals. "These are hotheaded people who want to do something," Bijan R. Kian, a director of the Export-Import Bank of the United States who is Iranian-born, says of the Afghans.
Beyond the heavily guarded gates of Herat University, the male and female students who roam the dusty campus, some dressed in full burkas, agree. Inside a computer lab with rows of Lenovo machines, a group of students in the university's two-year-old computer programming school nervously show off their projects to Brinkley and his contingent. The Herat IT program got a boost in November when IBM (IBM) signed a letter of intent with the University pledging to help train students after sending executives on one of Brinkley's tours. On this visit, Brinkley is trying to augment that. After the presentations, Neo Group's Vashistha offers to hire several of the students as interns. He also encourages them to look for ways to make money on what they've already created as student projects. He spends most of the afternoon and evening counseling and cajoling a smaller group of students. Ultimately, he decides that he'll start by bringing two of the students on as contractors to one of his companies; they'll work remotely from Herat. In addition, he plans to make an investment in a startup software company, Citadel Software, that he encountered during the trip.
The students respond with cautious excitement. Their lives have been split between Taliban rule and a war that began almost a decade ago. "Every day, we want something better," Eleena Kakar, a 21-year-old who recently graduated from Herat's IT program, says after a task force-hosted dinner. "The next generation will be different if we have peace, and if we get to do what we want."
Kate spade wanted to work in Afghanistan as the next step in its three-year-old partnership with the Washington-based NGO Women for Women International, a project that has taken the company to Bosnia. Brinkley's team coordinated a visit last August for kate spade executives including CEO Craig Leavitt, who announced the company's plans at an event held at the U.S. Embassy. "I was very skeptical," Leavitt says in an interview from his New York office. "We knew of the logistical problems because of the instability."
Four months later, kate spade's chief merchandising officer, Price, is reconnecting with the staff at Turquoise Mountain, a Kabul-based nonprofit that was created in 2006 through an agreement between Karzai and Britain's Prince Charles, with the goal of reviving arts and architecture in Kabul and creating an Afghan craft industry that could thrive locally and abroad. Turquoise Mountain takes 45 new students a year (970 applied in 2010) and trains them in traditional crafts. They spend about 60 percent of their time learning a specialty, such as jewelry making, and the rest studying business, law, and technology to help them become well-rounded entrepreneurs. At a recent local exhibit the students sold $20,000 worth of goods in four hours, all to local buyers, according to Shoshana Coburn, the group's managing director.
If all goes according to plan, Afghanistan-made cashmere scarves may begin production in Kabul this year and will eventually appear in kate spade stores as part of its "hand in hand" line, alongside pom-pom scarves and other products made in Bosnia. Kate spade's approach to the products is different from the traditional "a portion of the proceeds" model. The company buys the goods outright from the workers, typically at a multiple of local market prices. Kate spade then handles all the exporting and marketing costs involved in getting it to its stores.
The advantages for the producers—in this case, Afghan women—are clear. They get the money once they produce the wares instead of waiting for their share of the sale to make its way back to them. If the products sell well, then kate spade will make additional orders. The company aims to employ upwards of 1,500 women in Kabul by the end of 2013. "The Afghans feel that any attempts by the Americans to really change anything would be half done without leaving a viable economy behind," Leavitt says.
During his August visit, Leavitt arrived at Women for Women's Kabul training institute and sat on the floor among the participants and asked how he could help. A woman who had been unable to leave her home for seven years summed it up. "She just needed a market to sell," Leavitt says.
Kate spade is perfectly suited to working in Afghanistan. "Hand in hand" is equal parts philanthropy, entrepreneurship, and branding. "This is not a cash-aid partnership," Leavitt says. "Our goal is that this is ultimately a profit center for the women and for us. This is meant to be good solid economics for everyone." Still, it'll take a lot of kate spades to make Afghanistan matter in the global economy.
What Brinkley's project really needs is scale, and natural resources are the fastest way to push the country forward. According to a June Defense Dept. study, the estimated gold, copper, and iron ore reserves in the hills of Afghanistan make up a potential trillion-dollar opportunity. (The country's Ministry of Mines thinks it could be more than $3 trillion.) It's not worth much if it stays in the ground.
The biggest single foreign investment came from mining—and from a Chinese company. Metallurgical Corp. of China was awarded the Aynak copper mine project in 2007. The Minister of Mines has held additional talks with foreign companies including ArcelorMittal, Total, and Eni, he told investors at a briefing in London last year.
Getting companies from countries not directly involved in the military effort is crucial to the long-term success of economic development, says Thomas P.M. Barnett, chief analyst at consulting firm Wikistrat. "The guys who are going to benefit are going to be from the non-Allied pool." Brinkley is agnostic and has recruited foreign companies, including Daimler, into Iraq. "This is not just about U.S. companies," he says.
Another small mine project stands as a test of the viability of natural-resources investing in Afghanistan. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) assembled investors who ponied up $50 million for a mine in the rugged fly-over country between Kabul and Herat.
JPMorgan bankers, drawing on knowledge of the country's natural resources from its mining clients in the former Soviet Union, shared some of that intelligence with Brinkley's team in 2008 and during the next two years worked to gather additional data. The results were presented to Petraeus and Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates last January. With the money raised, the mining project was granted a license late in 2010.
Ian Hannam, a managing director at JPMorgan who helped arrange the deal, says a successful mine has profound economic consequences. "With the mine comes a village, with the village comes a hospital and a school," he says. "Capitalism is like a good virus. You'll be amazed how quickly people turn up once someone has success."
Brinkley's charge is spreading that virus, and while he stresses realism, progress, and patience, he's hopeful. Back at Qala Ikhtyaruddin, Herat spreads out before him, its signature mosque jutting into the haze. The business tourists, having taken pictures all the way up, turn quiet.
Brinkley stands alone, resting his elbows on a massive ledge that looms hundreds of feet above a neighborhood of small homes. "I came here thinking there was nothing, but there's so much," he says. "This place, they really get it. All we need is time."



businessweek





 

Assessing Wikipedia, Wiki-Style, on Its 10th Anniversary

How the online "temple of the mind" became the go-to site for looking stuff up: A drama told in the open-source style of Wikipedia



This article was produced under a loose interpretation of Wikipedia's collaborative principles. Where indicated, it was rewritten, corrected, and commented upon by outside participants.
It's easy to forget, but 10 years ago it took serious effort to find decent information on the Internet. Searching the Web was like picking through a vast antique shop: There was the occasional find, and a lot of secondhand junk.
Interested in Russian-made Tupolev airplanes? An obsessive hobbyist had a home page about them. Someone mentioned Volapük at a party? There was a university site with shards of information about the little-known language invented in the 19th century (not to be confused with the French avant-garde rock band of the same name). Then in 1999 came a simple idea from a search engine entrepreneur named Jimmy Wales: a free encyclopedia written by experts donating their time to draft articles and conduct peer review. The content would be copyable and ad-supported. It would be called Nupedia.
The site's team of PhDs moved at a pace that was indeed scholarly: In its first year, they created barely a dozen entries. Wales realized Nupedia needed a feeder site, something less exclusive that would attract writers. On this new site, any visitor would be able to write about whatever he wanted.
The experiment was unpopular with Nupedia's editors and advisory board—the fact that the uncredentialed were encouraged to contribute could, they reasoned, threaten the credibility of the encyclopedia. After less than a week, the new site was spun off into a separate project called Wikipedia—a "wiki" (Hawaiian for quick) is software that allows users to write, edit, and link Web pages on a single shared document. Within a year the new site had 20,000 articles. When Nupedia shut down in early 2003, it was stuck at 24 articles.
Jan. 15 is Wikipedia's 10th birthday. According to its own Wikipedia page, it has 17 million entries in more than 250 languages—including 118,000 in Volapük. The Encyclopedia Britannica has 120,000, and only in English. Free of charge—and of ads—the site is one of the most visited on the Web. It is the first stop for bar wagerers, high school paper writers, oppo researchers, and anyone trying to figure out what the Peace of Westphalia did or when the mortgage-backed security was invented or whom Ringo Starr replaced as the Beatles' drummer. The entry for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill went up on Apr. 21—less than a day after the rig explosion, and before anyone had any idea of its extent. "US Coast Guard has already launched a rescue operation," the article's last sentence read. (Comment)
Even some of the site's staunchest supporters admit they initially doubted it would amount to much. The idea sounds like a utopian social experiment: a record of the world's knowledge, produced and policed by volunteers. Today anyone can still contribute to an entry, and many do. But rather than collapsing into chaos and endless arguments over the exact diameter of the second Death Star (a debate that, in fact, continues), the world of the self-proclaimed Wikipedians has grown into a thriving online society. "Its existence is proof of a radically different way of organizing production," says Yochai Benkler, a professor at Harvard Law School who studies social networks and the Internet.
Exactly what, though, does Wikipedia prove? The site has exponentially outgrown the humble expectations of Wales and co-founder Larry Sanger but has had to weather controversies over inaccuracy and manipulation. Recent years have brought complaints from contributors that the site is abandoning the welcoming ethos that once distinguished it, and voices inside and outside the Wikipedian community are questioning whether radical openness and accuracy can coexist. It remains to be seen whether Wikipedia's collaborative volunteerism can be applied to other realms, whether it can be preserved in Wikipedia itself, and—most fundamentally—whether it can produce something of reliable value for those not involved in the game.
Wikipedia was not the only online encyclopedia to be launched around the turn of the millennium. Along with Nupedia, there was an interlinked database called Everything2 where anyone could submit an article but no one could edit others' submissions. There was also H2G2, a playful miscellany inspired by Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Before those there was Britannica, which had gone online quietly in December 1993. Microsoft's (MSFT) CD-ROM based Encarta, which was neither collaborative nor originally online, was seen as the primary digital threat to traditional encyclopedias like Britannica because it was given away free with new PCs.
According to Benjamin Mako Hill, a researcher at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who has looked at these early efforts, Wikipedia owes its success to several key decisions. "It's very tempting for people to say, 'We're online, now we're going to do something very different from what people did before,' " Hill says. But that would leave many contributors confused about what to contribute. Wikipedia didn't do that—the entries, though they're born of a new method of encyclopedia writing, are meant to read like the old Britannica.
Second, Wikipedia was user-friendly. Someone who found an error, or knew something about a subject that didn't have an entry, was a click or two away from taking action. The site's success attracted still more contributors. Soon scholars like Benkler and Clay Shirky were celebrating Wikipedia as a prime example of how the Web could upend assumptions about human motivation and organization. Here were people contributing hours of their time, gratis, to build what Wales called "a temple of the mind." Wikipedia's model bears much similarity to free and open-source software that took off in the 1990s with the release of Linux and Mozilla. But Wikipedia, with its diverse, international body of contributors, couldn't just be dismissed as a cultural oddity or a particular slice of geekdom—at least not after it expanded beyond physics equations and Star Trek recaps and into the rest of humanity's hard-won knowledge.
Still, concerns about the site's accuracy grew along with its influence. As the satirical newspaper The Onion put it in a recent headline: "Wikipedia Celebrates 750 Years Of American Independence." In most widely read entries, falsehoods are quickly corrected, but in others misinformation can survive far longer. In the fall of 2005, John Seigenthaler, a former aide to Robert F. Kennedy and the founding editorial director of USA Today, discovered that a Wikipedia page named him as a suspect in RFK's assassination. More than four months after the false charge was published, the entry was finally corrected. Seigenthaler did not correct the entry himself; he wrote an op-ed for USA Today pointing out Wikipedia's inaccuracies. The incident led Wales to acknowledge that entries were being written faster than they could be reviewed, and to announce a policy where unregistered users would no longer be able to create entries. (Registration is free and instant, and does not require personal information.)
One of Wikipedia's loudest critics is co-founder Sanger, whom Wales laid off when the dot-com bubble burst. For Sanger, scandals like the Seigenthaler episode can't be avoided without changing Wikipedia beyond recognition. "I just don't think it's really even possible given the nature of the project," he says.
In 2006 Sanger started Citizendium, a competing wiki-based encyclopedia with "gentle expert oversight" and contributors who use their real names.
At the same time, analyses of Wikipedia's accuracy have generally found that, while it's occasionally wrong, it's not much more wrong than traditional encyclopedias. A 2005 study in the journal Nature found that in a sample of articles, there were an average of 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica and 3.86 for Wikipedia. (Britannica objected to the Nature study, calling the methodology "fatally flawed.") Wikipedia, however, has problems Brittanica doesn't. An error corrected in Britannica stays corrected; in Wikipedia, it may not. (By the same token, rapidly changing events can be covered in pace by Wikipedia.) Then there are the tastes of its editors. Popular culture looms large. The entry for the video game Halo, for example, is significantly longer than the one for the Protestant Reformation.
More seriously, Wikipedia has to weed out inaccuracies introduced not by accident or through the ignorance of contributors but intentionally. Sometimes, as in the Seigenthaler case, these are instances of vandalism. Other times it's résumé-polishing. In 2006 aides for Massachusetts representative Marty Meehan removed a Wikipedia mention of his campaign promise not to serve more than four terms—at the time he was on his seventh. Wales has edited his own bio page, deleting mentions of Sanger's role in the creation of Wikipedia.
Thanks to WikiScanner, software that cross-references the Net addresses of contributors, watchdogs have found that computers at ExxonMobil (XOM), PepsiCo (PEP), and Diebold (DBD), among others, have been used to remove unflattering information from the companies' entries. Last year, Wikipedia's arbitration council banned edits from all IP addresses owned by the Church of Scientology after years of dispute and deceptive editing by both adherents and critics of the religion.
Many of these worries apply to businesses that have taken parts of Wikipedia's model and monetized it. TripAdvisor and Yelp have created democracies of taste, empowering travelers and consumers to speak up and create a far greater wealth of opinion than any team of professional reviewers could. Still, the owners of the reviewed hotels and restaurants complain that the sites' anonymity allows for slander without repercussion.
Wikipedia has experimented with concentrating more power in the hands of "administrators," a select group of Wikipedia editors who have the ability to delete and restore oft-manipulated pages and to lock them down for a period of time to prevent further edits. These changes have brought a measure of stability to certain entries. (George W. Bush's is getting vandalized less often. During his Presidency, his picture was swapped with one of Hitler; he was described, briefly, as "the first person ever to masterbate [sic] in a public school more than 38 times.") But Wikipedia discussion boards are full of complaints about entries getting locked down without proper cause. And there seems to be no mechanism for assuring that administrators are knowledgeable about anything beyond the methods and rules of Wikipedia itself. (Comment)
The worry for some who have followed the encyclopedia over its first decade is that as the site matures, it will have a harder time attracting and retaining the volunteers who make it work. A research team led by the computer scientist Ed H. Chi at Xerox PARC has found that Wikipedia's growth, whether measured in entries, edits, volunteers, or even bytes, has been falling off for a few years. The number of active editors and rate of article creation both peaked in 2007. The site, Chi argues, has begun to behave less like a limitless information ecosystem and more like a biological one, a world where actors compete over limited resources. Today, all the obvious entries—Aristotle, electricity, the Magna Carta, the American Civil War—have been written, along with millions more. That leaves fewer new ones to write and increases the chance that a new entry will be deleted on the grounds that it, as Wikipedia's guidelines say, "lacks notability." An entry written by Wales himself about a South African restaurant was deleted on the grounds that it contained "no assertion of importance/significance." (It has since been reinstated.) But the main effect of the new competitiveness is to drive out newcomers, whom Chi found are more likely to have their entries and edits rejected.
Andrew Lih, a Wikipedia administrator and the author of The Wikipedia Revolution, says there was a feeling of euphoria when he joined the site in 2002. "There were only 30,000 or 40,000 entries," he says. "You'd look up Angkor Wat, and there'd be only one line. You'd add a paragraph or two. Someone else would come along and say, 'That's cool, here's some other stuff.' You'd look at a site on the Egyptian pyramids and borrow from it. It was empowering." Today, he says, the feeling of the place couldn't be more different. Wikipedia's overwhelming popularity has brought new scrutiny, and these days, Lih says, the dominant concern is protecting what's already there. "The environment today is, like, 'Don't touch anything,' " Lih says.
The problem, as Lih sees it, is that Wikipedia actually needs more eyes than ever. As PR firms, image consultants, and congressional aides get better at subtly shading entries, it's going to take more and more volunteers to shade them back. (Comment) Even the most seasoned administrator was once, in Wikipedian argot, a "clueless newbie." How well Wikipedia ages may depend on how much the newbies are allowed to grow up, too.


businessweek

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Microsoft chip deal ...

Microsoft chip deal sends Arm Holdings shares up

Shares in chipmaker Arm Holdings rose 2.2% 
after Microsoft said its new Windows operating 
system would be able to run on chips designed by Arm.

The chips are usually found in mobile phones and the deal is significant as previously Windows has been connected with Intel-designed chips.
Arm shares had initially jumped 12.6% in early trading to 531p.
"While expected, we view this as a very positive [deal] long-term for Arm," UBS analysts said in a note.
Microsoft will continue to use chip designs from Intel for other Windows-based products.

'Significant milestone'
 
Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer made the announcement during his keynote speech that opened the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.
Arm chief executive Warren East said the announcement marked a "significant milestone" for the company.
Windows combined with Arm technology would "enable innovative platforms to realise the future of computing, ultimately creating new market opportunities and delivering compelling products to consumers", he said.
Microsoft's mobile version of Windows already runs on Arm-designed chips.
About 80% of all mobiles, including Apple's iPhone 4, are built around chips made from Arm designs.

Determination
 
Arm, which was founded in 1990 and employs 1,700 people, has its headquarters in Cambridge in the UK, but also has operations in France, India, Sweden and the US.
The importance of the deal is "hard to overstate", according to Gareth Evans, analyst at brokers Investec.
"The confirmation shows a determination on the part of Microsoft to compete seriously with Apple and Google Android-based devices in the tablet and portable device market," he said.
"The new technology will eventually apply to a group of products, not just tablets, although it will realistically be two to three years before Arm-based products will be released."


bbc.co

US oil spill: 'Bad management' led to BP disaster

BP said it would try to ensure the lessons learned from the spill improved deepwater drilling operations
The companies involved in the Gulf of Mexico 
oil spill made decisions to cut costs and save 
time that contributed to the disaster, a US 
panel has concluded.

In a chapter of its final report, to be published next week, the presidential commission said the failures were "systemic" and likely to recur.
BP did not have adequate controls in place to ensure safety, it found.
The April blast aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig killed 11 people and caused one of the worst oil spills in history.
The Macondo well, about a mile under the sea's surface, eventually leaked millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, damaging hundreds of miles of coastline before it was capped in July.
BP said in a statement that the report, like its own investigation, had found the accident was the result of multiple causes, involving multiple companies.
But, it said, the company was working with regulators "to ensure the lessons learned from Macondo lead to improvements in operations and contractor services in deepwater drilling".
Transocean, which owned the Deepwater Horizon rig, said that "the procedures being conducted in the final hours were crafted and directed by BP engineers and approved in advance by federal regulators".
Halliburton also said it acted at the direction of BP and was "fully indemnified" by the oil giant.

'Avoidable' blow-out

 The new report criticises BP, which owned the Macondo well, Transocean and Halliburton, which managed the well-sealing operation, and blames inadequate government oversight and regulation.
Specific risks the report identifies include:
  • A flawed design for the cement used to seal the bottom of the well
  • A test of that seal identified problems but was "incorrectly judged a success"
  • The workers' failure to recognise the first signs of the impending blow-out
"Whether purposeful or not, many of the decisions that BP, Halliburton, and Transocean made that increased the risk of the Macondo blow-out clearly saved those companies significant time (and money)," the presidential panel wrote.
"BP did not have adequate controls in place to ensure that key decisions in the months leading up to the blow-out were safe or sound from an engineering perspective."
Don Boesch, a member of the investigating commission, told the BBC's World Today programme they had identified "a whole sequence of poor decisions with unfortunate consequences when put together".
He said that not all the faults lay with BP, although the company did have overall responsibility.
"For example the lack of a proper test that was done and the cement that was used to seal the bottom of the well, that was pretty clearly the direct responsibility of Halliburton," he said.
"When the well started to blow there were decisions made by Transocean about how the material coming up the well was handled, and those were unfortunate, fateful, decisions which actually led to the explosion."
Mr Boesch said government regulators are also criticised in the report.
"What we found was very limited oversight of these various activities and decisions, that the agency responsible in the Department of the Interior was understaffed, [and] didn't have the inspectors and technical analysts who were up to the task fully."
The findings came in the final report of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, which President Barack Obama convened in May to investigate the root causes of the spill and recommend changes to industry and government policy.
Though it lacked subpoena power, the panel reviewed thousands of pages of documents, interviewed hundreds of witnesses, and in the autumn conducted a series of public hearings.
In a statement released on Wednesday, Bob Graham, former Florida governor and a co-chairman of the commission, said the findings showed the blow-out was avoidable.
"This disaster likely would not have happened had the companies involved been guided by an unrelenting commitment to safety first," he said.

Risk factors
 
In a months-long investigation, the panel found that mistakes and "failures to appreciate risk" compromised safeguards "until the blow-out was inevitable and, at the very end, uncontrollable".
BP's "fundamental mistake", the panel wrote, was failing to exercise proper caution over the job of sealing the well with cement.
"Based on evidence currently available, there is nothing to suggest that BP's engineering team conducted a formal, disciplined analysis of the combined impact of these risk factors on the prospects for a successful cement job," the report reads.
The conclusions run counter to industry efforts to portray the Deepwater Horizon disaster as a rare occurrence, as oil companies prod the US government to open greater areas of the US coast to oil exploration.
"The blowout was not the product of a series of aberrational decisions made by rogue industry or government officials that could not have been anticipated or expected to occur again," the report read.
"Rather, the root causes are systemic and, absent significant reform in both industry practices and government policies, might well recur."


bbc.co

Monday, January 3, 2011

Oil price rises on factory data

Cold weather in Europe and the US has pushed the price of oil higher in the past few weeks.

Oil price up on 'manufacturing growth'

The price of oil has risen by more than a dollar a barrel after surveys suggested strong manufacturing growth in both the US and the eurozone.
The Institute of Supply Management (ISM) said US manufacturing grew in December at its fastest pace since May.
US light crude rose by $1.08 to $95.8 a barrel, while London Brent rose 94 cents to $95.83, before both slipped back to end the day slightly up.
Cold weather has pushed the price of oil higher in recent weeks.
'Significant recovery'
The ISM said that its index of manufacturing activity rose to 57 in December, up from 56.6 the previous month. Any reading over 50 suggests growth in the sector.
"All told, the December ISM index is consistent with a manufacturing industry on solid footing and an economy that re-accelerated in the fourth quarter," said Ryan Sweet at Moody's Analytics.
December was the 17th month in a row that the sector grew, according to ISM.
"We saw significant recovery for much of the US manufacturing sector in 2010," said Norbert Ore, head of the group's manufacturing business survey committee.
In Europe, the Markit Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) recorded a level of 57.1 for December, up from an earlier estimate of 56.8 and above November's 55.3.
Germany posted the strongest growth, but Greece's manufacturing sector continued to shrink.
Global shares also moved higher following the two surveys, with Wall Street up almost 93 points, or 0.8%, at 11,671.
In Germany, the Dax index closed up 76 points, or 1.1%, at 6,990, while in France the Cac 40 ended 96 points, or 2.5%, higher at 3,901.

 

bbc.co